PRINT PAGESins of the Father…. Part 2

Written by Roy Black

In my last post I criticized Justice Scalia for the last sentence of his dissent in the Maples case. “Because a faithful application of those precedents leads to the conclusion that Maples has not demonstrated cause to excuse his procedural default; and because the reasoning by which the Court justifies the opposite conclusion invites future evisceration of the principle that defendants are responsible for the mistakes of their attorneys; I respectfully dissent.”

I just read on the web two good examples of why Scalia’s reasoning doesn’t work in the practical world. I have copied and pasted them below. It goes without saying that lawyers, and especially trial lawyers, are fallible human beings and their clients should have relief, when through incompetence or worse, their lawyer fatally screws up. And how about Maples? Sitting in a concrete tomb deep inside a maximum security prison without any chance to oversee his lawyer’s work? Can we hold him responsible because a mix-up in his lawyer’s mailroom caused his notice of appeal not to be filed?

“A California lawyer has been criminally charged after allegedly appearing at court to represent clients at hearings in a drunken state. Michelle Winspur is accusing of blowing twice the legal limit on Oct. 7, 2011 when she was given a breath-alcohol test as she entered Kings County Superior Court in Hanford. She was tested because a court clerk said she sounded drunk when she called to say she was going to be late for trial. Winspur, now 45, also failed a sobriety test she was given on Dec. 8, 2011 as she left court after a client hearing. Already facing an attorney discipline case for allegedly being drunk during a 2010 trial in Monterrey County, Winspur had her law license suspended earlier this month. A defense lawyer pleaded not guilty on her behalf to the criminal charges last week, but Winspur herself did not appear because she apparently is in rehab.”

“A Florida lawyer was charged over the weekend with driving under the influence. It’s the third time Karen Miller has faced a DUI charge. Meanwhile, questions were raised by the prosecutor and the judge, according to a trial transcript, about whether she had been drinking during a client’s second-degree murder trial earlier this year. The judge declared a recess for approximately half a day, at one point, to allow Miller time to recover and return to court the following day ‘in the right frame of mind,’ the station reports. WINK says it reviewed personnel records of Miller’s work in former years, when she was an assistant public defender, and discovered the incident earlier this year is not the first time suspected alcohol consumption has interfered with her trial work. In 2009, a judge declared a mistrial because she failed to show up in court to represent her client, the article says. A workplace investigation determined that co-workers had found her ‘apparently passed out sitting at her desk . . . incoherent, slurring her words beyond comprehension . . . saying ‘I’m not that drunk.'”

Share this story:

1 Comment to Sins of the Father…. Part 2

  1. January 27, 2012 at 9:18 pm | Permalink

    Judges are held irresponsible all the time it’s called appeal courts usually heard on errors of law and not on the merits or facts > that’s why there are so many incarcerated wrongfully < stupid lawyer and stupid judge equals stupid opinion and someones life is ruined. In canada 5,000 are sitting in jail wrongfully convicted and we only have 105,000 total in jail. It's the best we have and it works most times is what the professionals will alway6s say of course they are not in jail.

Leave a Reply:

You must be logged in to post a comment.