PRINT PAGELozano: A Tale of Two Cities

Written by Roy Black

Lozano. Just the name conjures up a kaleidoscope of memories. A different time in my life. I still carry the scars of those battles. They so desperately wanted, no needed, a conviction they didn’t even do it subtly. Just a few years before we had defended Alvarez which spawned two riots and they didn’t want that again. I described Alvarez in the first chapter of my book, Black’s Law, but Lozano was too hard to write. Until now.

Why now? On Friday morning I participated in the 11th Judicial Circuit Centennial Symposium panel about the case. I agreed to do it without really thinking about what it would entail. Once I started it hit me. I read a small part of the file we created over the years. At one time it ran hundreds of banker boxes but there was only one left. The file was accumulated in the pre-electronic era and thus my hard drive was mostly empty. What I did read dredged up long forgotten details, some even at odds with my personal recollection.

First some background. I have the dubious distinction of representing someone involved in every riot in Miami during the 70s and 80s. Most of the time police officers charged with shootings or other misadventures. For some perverse reason I enjoyed representing street cops. When I was a PD, I battled them every day, but in the process I gained a grudging respect for the guys who worked the mean streets armed with only a hand gun and a survival instinct. I estimate I defended around one hundred cops all told.

William Lozano was one of these street cops. He was patrolling in Overtown on January 16, 1989, ironically the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday. It was only six days prior to the Super Bowl and the world’s press was in South Florida. Lozano saw two men on a motorcycle being chased by police cars. He walked into the street to get a better view and they tried to run him down. He fired, killing the driver, and the passenger died in the resulting crash. A Colombian policeman killing two African American men in Overtown is a recipe for violence in Miami, and predictably three days of riots ensued. The press coined him an out-of-control gunslinger and he drowned in the media tsunami.

The case has to be put in the context of the time. This was the Miami of the 1980s. Paradise Lost. Drug trafficking. Mariel boatlift. Haitian boat people. Drive-by shootings. Machine guns, cigarette boats and helicopters. It wasn’t a melting pot but a seething cauldron of ethnic groups who despised each other. Lozano wasn’t the cause of the riot, just the excuse.

Before it was over, the scope of the case was huge. There were two major trials: 8 weeks in Miami; and 3 weeks in Orlando. Two five-day evidentiary change of venue hearings, one in Miami and one in Tallahassee. There were five changes of venue. Ten appeals: the First District Court of Appeal 2 times; the Third District Court of Appeal 3 times; the Fifth District Court of Appeal once; and the Florida Supreme Court 4 times. We were determined to win at any cost, literally, and it almost broke us. We weren’t paid a dime until he was finally acquitted, and we had to borrow money to keep the law firm afloat.

There was intense media interest in the case. Before the first trial, we filed motions to move out of Miami, but the judge would not even give us a hearing. He had marching orders that the trial had to be in Miami. Local TV carried the trial live, and CNN, which just started, showed substantial parts of it live.

How poisonous was it? The entire courthouse was cleared during jury deliberations. Two armored personnel carriers were stationed in front, snipers on the roof and men with body armor and machine guns in the stairwells. A no-fly zone. Just the type of atmosphere for a calm deliberate consideration of the evidence. Lozano was convicted of manslaughter. The sentencing hearing was carried live on local TV to satisfy the unruly mob, and Lozano was sentenced to seven years. The appellate court promptly reversed the conviction noting the atmosphere was more akin to an armed camp than the sober calm reflection needed for a trial.

A new judge ordered a change of venue to Orlando, 225 miles from Miami. Finally things were looking good until disaster struck again. On April 29, 1992, the police officers in the Rodney King case were acquitted. In the ensuing riots 53 people died, thousands more were injured, with property damages of roughly $1 billion. In a knee-jerk response, our judge immediately changed the venue to Tallahassee because it had a larger population of African Americans. The reason was fairly obvious. We challenged that several times, finally getting the trial sent back to Orlando, the bucolic home of Disney World, with the only threat coming from the Pirates of the Caribbean. After three weeks, on May 29, 1993, four and a half years after the shooting, Lozano was finally acquitted.

What is it that Nietzsche said – if it doesn’t kill you it makes you stronger? Well, it almost killed me. I know it is a cliche; but there is truth in it.

Share this story:

8 Comments to Lozano: A Tale of Two Cities

  1. Rocky's Gravatar Rocky
    March 28, 2011 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    I remember the case well, It indeed was a horrible time, drugdealers, shootings, and all those riots! I remember we had to stay off the streets at a certain time, and I at the time lived near the grove, so after work I would hurry to pick up my daughter at school and rush home!!
    I can only inmagine how it must have been for all of you defending Lozano. Wasn’t his wife a police officer too???

  2. March 28, 2011 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    Many people know of your great ability to defend criminal defendants and that is what you’re mostly remembered by, but I know better. I know the work you have also done throughout the years to defend and protect the rights of many police officers accused in criminal court. You have always done your very best for your client; regardless of who or what he/she is and that is only one of the reasons why you earned my respect many, many years ago. Your notes on Lozano are right on point.
    Un abrazo and continue you great work,

  3. March 28, 2011 at 10:51 pm | Permalink

    Tunkey, Amsel, Pizzi Jr. and You are my favorite lawyers so far, but your experience is a force to reconned with lol.


  4. March 29, 2011 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Roy: Thank you for your excellent contribution to our panel discussion about this vitally important case. Everyone benefits when the participants in events of this magnitude share their memories and personal perspective.

    Thank you, too, for your work on behalf of those who face the power of the state,

  5. Young APD's Gravatar Young APD
    March 30, 2011 at 8:47 pm | Permalink


    Like you some years ago, I battle street cops everyday. And while I do in fact respect some of them (because they are actually honest and decent people), I find it so hard to have any ounce of respect for most. The often lie in their a-forms, reports, depositions and trial testimony. The violation of constitutional rights committed by so many of them shocks the conscience. Maybe it is my inexperience and youth, but I just don’t understand how as a defense attorney you developed such a respect for them. Maybe there is something I am missing that you can share.

  6. Sheila, Emeritus's Gravatar Sheila, Emeritus
    April 14, 2011 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    Dear APD: I can vouch for the fact that he treats police and other clients with respect, regardless of occupation or charge. Roy can wrap the long arm of the (defense) law around them — and can generally hug them to an acquittal. I wuz there.

  7. Richard Sharpstein's Gravatar Richard Sharpstein
    June 27, 2011 at 10:20 pm | Permalink

    Like Roy I enjoy the occasional defense of a cop charged in a criminal case. It is like Alice in Wonderland. Through the Looking Glass of defense practice. One of the most rewarding parts is how the Police Defendants appreciate the job of a skilled defense lawyer fighting for Justice on their behalf Any really dedicated defender can do it with skill and bravado. If the cause is right ,it is a thrill ride unlike the typical defense. Try it. You’ll like it!

  8. March 14, 2012 at 5:02 pm | Permalink

    Great article and the video on youtube is good too

Leave a Reply:

You must be logged in to post a comment.